Finite control: Where movement goes wrong in Brazilian Portuguese

Abstract

The aim of the present article is to deconstruct a specific line of argumentation used by Boeckx, Hornstein, and Nunes (2010) to support what is usually called the movement theory of control. Such line of argumentation involves the assumption that null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese are “controlled” in the sense that they are derived by A-movement out of finite clauses. It is shown that the postulation of finite control in Brazilian Portuguese requires assumptions that are not empirically supported. An alternative analysis is discussed and argued to be theoretically and empirically superior to movement analyses. That alternative analysis takes null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese to be elided topics.

How to Cite

Modesto, M., (2011) “Finite control: Where movement goes wrong in Brazilian Portuguese”, Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 10(2), 3-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.95

Download

Download PDF

342

Views

142

Downloads

5

Citations

Share

Authors

Marcello Modesto (Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto 403, Cidade Universitária – São Paulo – SP, CEP 05508-900)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Identifiers

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: 5f1b326bd507021b2fc026f6cbe03268